Prolonged FGF21 treatment increases energy expenditure and induces weight loss in obese mice independently of UCP1 and adrenergic signaling.

Fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) reduces body weight, which was attributed to induced energy expenditure (EE). Conflicting data have been published on the role of uncoupling protein 1 (UCP1) in this effect. Therefore, we aimed to revisit the thermoregulatory effects of FGF21 and their implications for body weight regulation. We found that an 8-day treatment with FGF21 lowers body weight to similar extent in both wildtype (WT) and UCP1-deficient (KO) mice fed high-fat diet. In WT mice, this effect is solely due to increased EE, associated with a strong activation of UCP1 and with excess heat dissipated through the tail. This thermogenesis takes place in the interscapular region and can be attenuated by a ß-adrenergic inhibitor propranolol. In KO mice, FGF21-induced weight loss correlates with a modest increase in EE, which is independent of adrenergic signaling, and with a reduced energy intake. Interestingly, the gene expression profile of interscapular brown adipose tissue (but not subcutaneous white adipose tissue) of KO mice is massively affected by FGF21, as shown by increased expression of genes encoding triacylglycerol/free fatty acid cycle enzymes. Thus, FGF21 elicits central thermogenic and pyretic effects followed by a concomitant increase in EE and body temperature, respectively. The associated weight loss is strongly dependent on UCP1-based thermogenesis. However, in the absence of UCP1, alternative mechanisms of energy dissipation may contribute, possibly based on futile triacylglycerol/free fatty acid cycling in brown adipose tissue and reduced food intake.

Impairment of adrenergically-regulated thermogenesis in brown fat of obesity-resistant mice is compensated by non-shivering thermogenesis in skeletal muscle.

OBJECTIVE: Non-shivering thermogenesis (NST) mediated by uncoupling protein 1 (UCP1) in brown adipose tissue (BAT) can be activated via the adrenergic system in response to cold or diet, contributing to both thermal and energy homeostasis. Other mechanisms, including metabolism of skeletal muscle, may also be involved in NST. However, relative contribution of these energy dissipating pathways and their adaptability remain a matter of long-standing controversy. METHODS: We used warm-acclimated (30 °C) mice to characterize the effect of an up to 7-day cold acclimation (6 °C; CA) on thermoregulatory thermogenesis, comparing inbred mice with a genetic background conferring resistance (A/J) or susceptibility (C57BL/6 J) to obesity. RESULTS: Both warm-acclimated C57BL/6 J and A/J mice exhibited similar cold endurance, assessed as a capability to maintain core body temperature during acute exposure to cold, which improved in response to CA, resulting in comparable cold endurance and similar induction of UCP1 protein in BAT of mice of both genotypes. Despite this, adrenergic NST in BAT was induced only in C57BL/6 J, not in A/J mice subjected to CA. Cold tolerance phenotype of A/J mice subjected to CA was not based on increased shivering, improved insulation, or changes in physical activity. On the contrary, lipidomic, proteomic and gene expression analyses along with palmitoyl carnitine oxidation and cytochrome c oxidase activity revealed induction of lipid oxidation exclusively in skeletal muscle of A/J mice subjected to CA. These changes appear to be related to skeletal muscle NST, mediated by sarcolipin-induced uncoupling of sarco(endo)plasmic reticulum calcium ATPase pump activity and accentuated by changes in mitochondrial respiratory chain supercomplexes assembly. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that NST in skeletal muscle could be adaptively augmented in the face of insufficient adrenergic NST in BAT, depending on the genetic background of the mice. It may provide both protection from cold and resistance to obesity, more effectively than BAT.

A pyrexic effect of FGF21 independent of energy expenditure and UCP1.

OBJECTIVE: Administration of FGF21 to mice reduces body weight and increases body temperature. The increase in body temperature is generally interpreted as hyperthermia, i.e. a condition secondary to the increase in energy expenditure (heat production). Here, we examine an alternative hypothesis: that FGF21 has a direct pyrexic effect, i.e. FGF21 increases body temperature independently of any effect on energy expenditure. METHODS: We studied the effects of FGF21 treatment on body temperature and energy expenditure in high-fat-diet-fed and chow-fed mice exposed acutely to various ambient temperatures, in high-fat diet-fed mice housed at 30 °C (i.e. at thermoneutrality), and in mice lacking uncoupling protein 1 (UCP1). RESULTS: In every model studied, FGF21 increased body temperature, but energy expenditure was increased only in some models. The effect of FGF21 on body temperature was more (not less, as expected in hyperthermia) pronounced at lower ambient temperatures. Effects on body temperature and energy expenditure were temporally distinct (daytime versus nighttime). FGF21 enhanced UCP1 protein content in brown adipose tissue (BAT); there was no measurable UCP1 protein in inguinal brite/beige adipose tissue. FGF21 increased energy expenditure through adrenergic stimulation of BAT. In mice lacking UCP1, FGF21 did not increase energy expenditure but increased body temperature by reducing heat loss, e.g. a reduced tail surface temperature. CONCLUSION: The effect of FGF21 on body temperature is independent of UCP1 and can be achieved in the absence of any change in energy expenditure. Since elevated body temperature is a primary effect of FGF21 and can be achieved without increasing energy expenditure, only limited body weight-lowering effects of FGF21 may be expected.